Reincarnation, as it is usually presented in the West, sounds like a bonus.
More lives. Another chance. The reassurance that death is not final.
Indian traditions do not treat it that way at all. Samsara is presented as a problem, and the entire apparatus of Indian religious practice is aimed at getting out of it.
Understanding that reversal is the key to understanding almost everything else in the tradition.
The Word
Samsara means wandering, or flowing through. The image is of movement without arrival.
It describes an endless sequence of births, deaths and rebirths, running through human, animal, and other forms of existence, driven by karma, with no natural end point.
Not a journey with a destination. A circuit.
It Was Not Always There
The Vedas do not clearly teach rebirth.
Early Vedic religion is concerned with this life and with a rather vaguely described afterlife: the world of the fathers, the world of the gods. There is no developed doctrine of return.
Samsara appears clearly in the Upanishads, from roughly 800 to 400 BCE. The Brihadaranyaka and the Chandogya both contain accounts of the paths a person takes after death, and both describe return.
The Chandogya’s version is memorable. Those whose conduct has been good attain a pleasant birth. Those whose conduct has been foul attain a foul one. And then there is a third category, described as small creatures, continually returning, of whom it is said: be born and die. That is a third state.
It reads less like a promise than a sentence.
Why It Counts as a Problem
Three features make samsara something to escape rather than enjoy.
It has no end. Even a fortunate rebirth ends. Even a heavenly one ends, in most formulations, once the merit that produced it is exhausted. Nothing achieved within the cycle stays achieved.
It involves suffering. Every life contains ageing, sickness, loss and death, and repeating that indefinitely does not improve it.
You do not remember. Continuity of person is broken at every transition. Whatever accumulates, the experience of it does not carry forward as memory.
Put together, samsara describes a mechanism that produces suffering, repeats indefinitely, and offers no cumulative benefit to the being caught in it.
Hence moksha, liberation, as the goal. Not a better life. No further lives.
Karma as the Engine
Karma is what keeps the wheel turning.
Actions leave impressions. Impressions produce tendencies. Tendencies produce further action, and the accumulated momentum carries a being into another birth.
Note what this means. Good karma is not an escape route. Virtuous action produces a better rebirth, and a better rebirth is still a rebirth. You have improved your seat on a train you were trying to get off.
Which is exactly why the Bhagavad Gita’s teaching on action matters. Krishna does not tell Arjuna to stop acting. He tells him to act without craving the results, because it is the craving that generates the binding impression.
Act that way and you can act indefinitely without accumulating what requires another life to work out.
Who Is Reborn
The traditions agree on the cycle and disagree sharply about what travels through it.
Hindu schools generally posit a continuing atman or jiva, an individual self that carries impressions from life to life. This solves the transmission problem and raises another: if the self is unchanging, how does it accumulate anything?
Buddhism denies a permanent self altogether, which makes the question acute. Its answer involves causal continuity rather than a persisting entity. The being who experiences the result is neither the same as nor different from the one who acted. The standard image is a flame passed from one candle to another: continuous, causally connected, not the same flame.
Jainism takes the most physical position. The jiva is a real soul, and karma is a subtle material substance that adheres to it and weighs it down. Liberation involves shedding that matter, and the liberated soul rises to the top of the universe and remains there.
Three mechanisms, defended in detail for two thousand years, none of them conceding to the others.
The Objection Nobody Settled
There is a problem the traditions took seriously and never fully resolved.
If a person’s circumstances result from actions in a life they cannot remember, in what sense are those actions theirs? Personal identity is doing a great deal of work in the doctrine, and it is not obvious the work holds.
Buddhism confronted this most directly, precisely because it denies the self that would make the answer easy.
There is also a moral objection with real historical weight. Karma and samsara have been used to explain existing social hierarchy as deserved, and therefore as not requiring remedy. The major philosophical traditions reject that application, and compassionate action is itself karma with its own consequences. But the application happened, repeatedly, and it is not honest to skip past it.
The Wheel
Tibetan Buddhist art depicts samsara as the bhavachakra, the wheel of life, held in the jaws of Yama, lord of death.
The hub shows a pig, a snake and a cock, biting each other’s tails: ignorance, aversion and craving, the three forces that keep the wheel turning. The outer rings show the six realms of possible rebirth and the twelve links of dependent origination.
The whole image is designed to be looked at and found unappealing. It is not a diagram of opportunity.
Somewhere outside the wheel, in most versions, a small figure of the Buddha points towards the moon.
Which is the entire argument in one picture. The wheel is enormous, detailed, and comprehensive. The way out is the small thing at the edge, easy to miss, and pointing somewhere else entirely.
Samsara: Reader Questions
What is samsara? T
he cycle of birth, death and rebirth described in Indian traditions. The word means wandering, and it describes movement without arrival.
Is reincarnation seen as a good thing?
No. Indian traditions overwhelmingly present samsara as a problem to escape, not an opportunity. The goal is liberation from the cycle.
Do the Vedas teach rebirth?
Not clearly. The doctrine appears distinctly in the Upanishads from roughly 800 to 400 BCE.
What keeps the cycle going?
Karma. Actions leave impressions that produce tendencies, which produce further action and carry a being into another birth.
Does good karma lead to liberation?
Not directly. Good karma produces a better rebirth, which is still a rebirth. Liberation requires ending the accumulation rather than improving it.
What is reborn in Buddhism?
Not a permanent self, which Buddhism denies. The answer involves causal continuity, often illustrated as a flame passed between candles.
Sources consulted: The Principal Upanishads, S. Radhakrishnan; Wendy Doniger O’Flaherty, ed., Karma and Rebirth in Classical Indian Traditions (1980); Rupert Gethin, The Foundations of Buddhism (1998); Paul Dundas, The Jains (2002).
Leave a Reply