Patanjali defines meditation in nine Sanskrit words, and the definition is almost entirely about continuity.
Tatra pratyayaikatanata dhyanam. Sutra 3.2. In that place, the uninterrupted flow of a single idea is meditation.
Not effort. Not concentration. Flow.
The Limb Before It
Dhyana cannot be understood on its own, because it is defined against what precedes it.
Dharana, the sixth limb, is concentration. Sutra 3.1 describes it as binding attention to a place. A point, an object, a mantra, the breath. You put attention there.
And it leaves. It always leaves. So you bring it back.
That returning is the practice. Somebody sitting for twenty minutes may return attention two hundred times, and every one of those returns is dharana working correctly.
Dhyana is what happens when the returning stops being necessary.
Attention has settled and stays settled. The flow towards the object is continuous rather than repeatedly re-established. Sutra 3.2 uses the word ekatanata, which carries the sense of a single unbroken thread.
The difference between the sixth and seventh limbs is not effort or technique. It is whether the thread breaks.
And the One After
Samadhi, the eighth limb, follows the same logic one step further.
In dhyana there is still somebody attending. In samadhi, sutra 3.3, the object alone shines forth and the awareness attending to it becomes as though empty of its own form.
The three together are called samyama, and sutra 3.4 treats them as one graduated process rather than three separate achievements. Concentration deepens into meditation deepens into absorption.
You do not switch techniques between them. The technique is the same. What changes is how much of it is left.
What It Is Not
Modern usage has stretched the word meditation to cover almost anything done attentively, so the classical sense is worth stating clearly.
It is not relaxation. Relaxation may accompany it and is not the aim. Patanjali is describing a change in the structure of attention, not a reduction in muscle tension.
It is not thinking about something. Reflection, analysis and contemplation in the ordinary sense all involve a sequence of ideas. Dhyana is one idea, unbroken.
It is not emptying the mind. The object remains. Something is present, continuously. The instruction to make the mind blank appears nowhere in Patanjali.
It is not a technique you perform. This is the one people find hardest. Dharana is something you do. Dhyana is something that occurs when dharana has been done long enough.
You cannot practise dhyana directly. You can only practise dharana and let dhyana arrive.
What to Rest Attention On
Patanjali is unusually relaxed about the object, and this is easy to miss.
In the first chapter, sutras 1.33 to 1.39, he offers a series of options for steadying the mind: cultivating friendliness and compassion, regulating breath, attending to a luminous inner perception, focusing on somebody free from craving, reflecting on knowledge from dream or sleep.
Then, in 1.39, he adds what amounts to a shrug. Or meditate on whatever is agreeable.
A classical text with a reputation for severity is telling the practitioner that the object matters less than the steadiness. What is required is that attention can rest there without struggle.
Later traditions supplied their own objects. A deity form. A mantra. A chakra. The breath at the nostrils. The flame of a lamp, in the practice called trataka.
Where Buddhism Fits
The parallels between Patanjali’s account and Buddhist meditation literature are close, and the relationship has been argued about for a long time.
Buddhist tradition uses jhana in Pali, dhyana in Sanskrit, for stages of absorption, and describes a progression from states involving thought and examination toward states where both fall away.
The Chinese pronunciation of dhyana became chan. The Japanese pronunciation of chan became zen.
So the word for the seventh limb of Patanjali’s system travelled to China with Buddhist monks, changed shape twice, and came back to the English-speaking world as the name of a Japanese school.
Which tradition influenced which is unresolved and probably unresolvable. What the overlap establishes is that these were not the private claims of one school.
How Long It Takes
The texts are not encouraging about speed, and I think that is a point in their favour.
Sutra 1.14 states the conditions for practice to take hold: it must be maintained for a long time, without interruption, and with sincerity. All three are specified explicitly.
Vyasa’s commentary, from around 500 to 600 CE, discusses the duration of a single moment of dhyana in terms that suggest it was understood as brief and hard-won.
Most practitioners will spend their entire practice in dharana. Returning attention, losing it, returning it again.
Patanjali does not treat that as failure. In his arrangement, the returning is the sixth limb functioning exactly as designed, and the sixth limb is where the last three begin.
What Actually Happens on a Cushion
Strip the framework away and the instruction is small.
Sit in a way that does not distract you. Put attention somewhere. When it leaves, notice, and bring it back without commentary about having lost it.
That is the whole of it, and every tradition surveyed here would recognise the description.
The elaborate maps of stages, absorptions and grades exist to describe what happens if somebody does that consistently for years. They are not the instruction. They are a report from further down the road, written by people who wanted those coming behind them to know the road went somewhere.
A note on practice: this article explains a classical framework rather than teaching it. Anyone taking up sustained meditation practice, particularly with a history of mental health difficulty, is best served by working with a qualified teacher.
Dhyana: Common Questions
What is dhyana?
The seventh limb of Patanjali’s system, defined in sutra 3.2 as the uninterrupted flow of a single idea toward an object of attention.
What is the difference between dharana and dhyana?
Dharana is concentration repeatedly re-established when attention drifts. Dhyana is that attention becoming continuous so the returning is no longer needed.
Is dhyana the same as samadhi?
No. In dhyana there is still somebody attending. In samadhi even that sense of attending falls away and only the object remains.
Can you practise dhyana directly?
Not according to the classical account. Dhyana arises from sustained dharana rather than being performed as a separate technique.
What should you meditate on?
Patanjali offers several options in sutras 1.33 to 1.39 and then adds that one may meditate on whatever is agreeable. The steadiness matters more than the object.
Is dhyana related to Zen?
Yes, linguistically. Dhyana became chan in Chinese and zen in Japanese as Buddhist meditation traditions travelled east.
Sources consulted: Edwin Bryant, The Yoga Sutras of Patañjali (2009); Vyasa, Yoga Bhashya; B.K.S. Iyengar, Light on the Yoga Sutras of Patanjali (1993); Rupert Gethin, The Foundations of Buddhism (1998).
Leave a Reply